[UPHPU] httpd.conf RedirectPermanent

[Brandon Stout]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matthew Frederico wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Brandon Stout wrote:
>
>> Are my premises for using it all accurate?
> 
> Of course they are.  If it gets the job done and you have the desired results.
> 
> If socat and a bash script are all you need for your webserver, thats
> great too.  If its design accomplishes your purpose - that's the way
> to go!

I'm not sure if I'm getting the desired results.  I think I am, but I
want to see what others think.  I'll restate my premises as questions:

 * Does RedirectPermenent sends the appropriate signal to whatever is
requesting the domain, saying that this is a permanent thing?  Is that
signal more appropriate than a mod rewrite, which doesn't tell the web
anything, but just redirects internally?
 * Does it require less processing?  Is it significantly less enough
that it makes a difference when hosting hundreds of domains?
 * If it requires less processing, it's almost certainly faster to do a
RedirectPermanent instead of a mod rewrite, but is it significantly
faster, when hosting hundreds of domains on the same server?
 * Is there less coding involved?

Brandon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkndhY0ACgkQx0pgn74qrcJgVgCfTKQJr5/OQCQksw2HdVAAQP5L
9JIAn3lZMXH3akwJnRVa4pvzNyukS5gj
=fzTs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----