[UPHPU] Source Code Control Options
Wade Preston Shearer
lists at wadeshearer.com
Mon Mar 10 09:24:50 MDT 2008
On 10 Mar 2008, at 8:27, Mike Mackrory wrote:
> I was hoping I could tap into some of the experience of the group.
> I've
> been tasked with researching options for a new Source Code Control
> System.
> Our current system doesn't allow us to check in/out code or roll
> changes
> back, hence the need to find a new one.
>
> Does anyone have any recommendations for systems they would
> recommend that I look at, or avoid? The primary development
> machines run on Windows and it would be preferable that the code
> itself be stored on a Linux box.
There are two types of version control systems: centralized and
distributed. CVS and Subversion are two of the most popular
centralized options. Git and Arch are two of the most popular (I
believe) distributed options. I have never used a distributed system
so I cannot comment on that from first-hand experience, but because of
the way I use a version control system (for web development, not
software development), centralized works very well. I have used both
CVS and SVN and prefer SVN.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2425 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://uphpu.org/pipermail/uphpu/attachments/20080310/11d609d8/smime.bin
More information about the UPHPU
mailing list