[UPHPU] Template engines
John David Anderson
uphpu at johndavidanderson.net
Wed Oct 4 16:22:03 MDT 2006
On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Walt Haas wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'd be interested to hear from any graphic artists out there what they
> see as the pros and cons of template engines in general, and Smarty in
> particular. Are these templates easier for an artist to work with
> than the equivalent PHP code?
There seems to be a few reasons people like templating engines: 1-MVC
type structure, 2-Easy to hand to designers, 3-More "secure", 4-Caching.
They way I see it, <? and ?> are just as easy for designers to
recognize as XML, Smarty tags, or anything else. I used to be a big
Smarty fan until I realized that PHP is already a great templating
engine... and I already know it. :) I got really tired up looking up
template engine functions that did what PHP could do already. It just
adds to what you need to know to get things done, and it doesn't' do
it any faster or better than PHP.
Caching and MVC can be done well by a good framework.
If you're worried that a designer may mess with your code, then you
shouldn't be working with them anyway.
-- John
More information about the UPHPU
mailing list